PROTOCOLOS DE CARGA PARA PUENTES DE ACERO SUJETOS A BAJOS FACTORES DE SOBRERRESISTENICA
Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 12, 2019
Main Article Content
Abstract
Como parte del Proyecto Anchorage Port Access Bridge, se llevó a cabo un estudio acerca de los diferentes protocolos de carga aplicados en distintas secciones de vigas principales en marcos de puentes de acero. Se aplicarán distintos ciclos dinámicos de carga con el fin de capturar el comportamiento particular del puente. Este se caracteriza por la cedencia de las vigas principales antes que las columnas. Para ello se lleva a cabo un análisis computacional en SeismoStruct, que comprende un análisis pushover-estático y uno de historia en el tiempo, a fin de determinar en qué ciclo la columna y la viga entran en cedencia, luego se compara los resultados entre protocolos para determinar qué historial de carga permite analizar la respuesta de cada elemento.
Article Details
How to Cite
PROTOCOLOS DE CARGA PARA PUENTES DE ACERO SUJETOS A BAJOS FACTORES DE SOBRERRESISTENICA. (2019). Ciencia, 21(2), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.24133/ciencia.v21i2.1516
Issue
Section
ARTÍCULOS
- Los autores/as conservarán plenos derechos de autor sobre su obra y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada de Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 4.0), que permite a terceros la redistribución, comercial y no comercial, siempre y cuando la obra no se modifique y se transmita en su totalidad, reconociendo su autoría.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada, siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores difundir su obra a través de internet (p. ej.:en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envíom lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada.
How to Cite
PROTOCOLOS DE CARGA PARA PUENTES DE ACERO SUJETOS A BAJOS FACTORES DE SOBRERRESISTENICA. (2019). Ciencia, 21(2), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.24133/ciencia.v21i2.1516
References
1. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 461). (2007). Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components.
2. Alaska Seismic Hazards Safety Commission (ASHSC). (2019, January 9). Earthquake Risk in Alaska. Retrieved from http://seismic.alaska.gov/earthquake_risk.html
3. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC 341-10). (2010). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, Illinois 60601-1802: AISC Committee on Specifications.
4. ANSI/AISC 341-10. (2010). AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction.
5. Applied Technology Council (ATC-24). (1992). Guildelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures.
6. Bruneau, M., Uang, C. M., & Whittaker, A. (2001). Ductile design of steel structures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Calderón, V., Palma, A., Kowalsky, M., & Nau, J. (2018). Achorage Port Access Bridge Proyect. Proyect developed in Constructed Facilities Lab (CFL)at NCSU as part of AlaskaDOT: Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering,.
8. Fulmer, S., Kowalsky, M., & Nau, J. (2015). Grouted shear stud connection for steel bridge substructures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 109, 72-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.009
9. Ge, H., Kang, L., & Tsumura, Y. (2013). Extremely Low-Cycle Fatigue Tests of Thick-Walled Cycle Fatigue Tests. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 18, Issue 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000429
10. Goodnight, J. C., Kowalsky, M. J., & Nau, J. M. (2013). Effect of Load History on Performance Limit States of Circular Bridge Columns. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Volume 18 Issue 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000495
11. Lanning, J., Benzoni, G., & Uang, C.-M. (2016). Using Buckling-Restrained Braces on Long-Span Bridges. I:Full-Scale Testing and Design Implications. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Volume 21 Issue 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000781
12. Moustafa, M. A.-R. (2014). Structural Behavior of Bent Cap Beams in As-built and Retrofitted Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
13. Shen, J.-D., Yen, W., & O'fallon, J. (2004). Handbook for seismic performance testing of bridge piers. Vancouver, B.C., Canada : 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1682.
14. Stewart, M. G., & Val, D. V. (1999, July). Role of Load History in Reliability-Based Decision Analysis of Aging Bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, Volume 125 Issue 7 -. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:7(776)
2. Alaska Seismic Hazards Safety Commission (ASHSC). (2019, January 9). Earthquake Risk in Alaska. Retrieved from http://seismic.alaska.gov/earthquake_risk.html
3. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC 341-10). (2010). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, Illinois 60601-1802: AISC Committee on Specifications.
4. ANSI/AISC 341-10. (2010). AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction.
5. Applied Technology Council (ATC-24). (1992). Guildelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures.
6. Bruneau, M., Uang, C. M., & Whittaker, A. (2001). Ductile design of steel structures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Calderón, V., Palma, A., Kowalsky, M., & Nau, J. (2018). Achorage Port Access Bridge Proyect. Proyect developed in Constructed Facilities Lab (CFL)at NCSU as part of AlaskaDOT: Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering,.
8. Fulmer, S., Kowalsky, M., & Nau, J. (2015). Grouted shear stud connection for steel bridge substructures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 109, 72-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.009
9. Ge, H., Kang, L., & Tsumura, Y. (2013). Extremely Low-Cycle Fatigue Tests of Thick-Walled Cycle Fatigue Tests. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 18, Issue 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000429
10. Goodnight, J. C., Kowalsky, M. J., & Nau, J. M. (2013). Effect of Load History on Performance Limit States of Circular Bridge Columns. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Volume 18 Issue 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000495
11. Lanning, J., Benzoni, G., & Uang, C.-M. (2016). Using Buckling-Restrained Braces on Long-Span Bridges. I:Full-Scale Testing and Design Implications. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Volume 21 Issue 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000781
12. Moustafa, M. A.-R. (2014). Structural Behavior of Bent Cap Beams in As-built and Retrofitted Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
13. Shen, J.-D., Yen, W., & O'fallon, J. (2004). Handbook for seismic performance testing of bridge piers. Vancouver, B.C., Canada : 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1682.
14. Stewart, M. G., & Val, D. V. (1999, July). Role of Load History in Reliability-Based Decision Analysis of Aging Bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, Volume 125 Issue 7 -. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:7(776)