On networked control systems under time, measurement, and process uncertainties

Main Article Content

Carlos Xavier Rosero Chandi
Cristina Fernanda Vaca Orellana
Iván Iglesias Navarro
Luz María Tobar Subía Contento
Milton Alejandro Gavilanez Villalobos

Abstract

The performance of control loops closed over communication networks can deteriorate due to variable time delays caused by network congestion and latency and by the processing of the control algorithms, an effect known in periodic sampling as jitter. To remove this detrimental effect on stability/performance, the method of synchronization at actuation instants uses an observer to estimate the value of the states at actuation, knowing state measurements at sampling, which entails strictly periodic actuation. However, its successful application requires noise-free samples and undisturbed process issues are impossible. In this work, the model mentioned above is extended to the case of other non-ideal operating conditions. In particular, a Kalman filter is incorporated into the synchronized actuation model, considering that the available measurements of the states are not periodic. This raises the problem of adapting the standard discrete-time Kalman filter to the case under study and deciding when to apply the prediction and correction phases. The immediate benefit is that synchronized actuation eliminates the harmful effects of uncertainty over time, and the Kalman filter improves performance in the face of uncertainty in measurements and the process.

Article Details

How to Cite
On networked control systems under time, measurement, and process uncertainties. (2021). MASKAY, 11(2), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.24133/maskay.v11i2.1826
Section
TECHNICAL PAPERS

How to Cite

On networked control systems under time, measurement, and process uncertainties. (2021). MASKAY, 11(2), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.24133/maskay.v11i2.1826

References

[1] Y. Tipsuwan y M. Y. Chow, “Control methodologies in networked control systems,” Control Eng. Pract., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1099-1111, Oct. 2003.

[2] J. Baillieul y P. J. Antsaklis, “Control and Communication Challenges in Networked Real-Time Systems,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 9-28, Jan. 2007.

[3] J. Hespanha, P. Naghshtabrizi y Y. Xu, “A Survey of Recent Results in Networked Control Systems,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 95, n.o 1, pp. 138-162, Jan. 2007.

[4] C. Lozoya, P. Martí, M. Velasco y J. M. Fuertes, “Analysis and design of networked control loops with synchronization at the actuation instants,” in The 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics, Orlando, FL, USA, Nov. 2008, pp. 2899-2904.

[5] P. S. Maybeck, “Stochastic Models, Estimation, and Control,” Academic Press, 1979.

[6] R. E. Kalman, “A new approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems,” J. Basic Eng., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 35-45, Mar. 1960.

[7] W. Li, S. L. Shah, y D. Xiao, “Kalman filters in non-uniformly sampled multirate systems: For FDI and beyond,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 199-208, Jan. 2008.

[8] Y. S. Suh, V.H. Nguyen, y Y. S. Ro, “Modified Kalman filter for networked monitoring systems employing a send-on-delta method,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 332-338, Feb. 2007.

[9] K. J. Aström y Björn Wittenmark, “Computer-controlled systems: theory and design (3 ed.),” Prentice-Hall, 1997.

[10] Martí, M. Velasco, C. Lozoya y J. M. Fuertes, “Clock Synchronization for Networked Control Systems Using Low-Cost Microcontrollers,” Research report ESAII-RR-08-02, Automatic Control Dept., Technical University of Catalonia, Abr. 2008.

[11] Henriksson, A. Cervin y K.E. Arzén, “TrueTime: Simulation of control loops under shared computer resources,” IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 35, no 1, pp. 417-422, Jan. 2002.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)